New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 380 indexed citations. Written by Koji Yamanaka and Finn Ankersen covering the research area of Aerospace Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Aerospace Engineering (367 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (235 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (45 citations). Published in Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2514/2.4875 →

Countries where authors are citing New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2514/2.4875.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026