Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society

719 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1988, received 719 indexed citations. Written by Nigel Thrift and John Agnew covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (379 citations), Political Science and International Relations (205 citations) and Urban Studies (129 citations). Published in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/622518 →

Countries where authors are citing Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Place and Politics. The Geographical Mediation of State and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/622518.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026