The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia

930 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 930 indexed citations. Written by Paul James, Simon Marginson and Mark Considine covering the research area of Education and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (554 citations), Education (486 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (164 citations). Published in Academe.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/40252127 →

Countries where authors are citing The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/40252127.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026