Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/40199307 →Countries where authors are citing Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa
This map shows the geographic impact of Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa
This network shows the impact of Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa.
About Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa
This paper, published in 1964, received 404 indexed citations . Written by Geoffrey F. Engholm and Clifford Geertz. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (237 citations), Political Science and International Relations (124 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (109 citations). Published in International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/40199307.