Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest

649 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1978, received 649 indexed citations. Written by Donald Ludwig, Dixon D. Jones and C. S. Holling covering the research area of Genetics, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (281 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (233 citations) and Ecology (181 citations). Published in Journal of Animal Ecology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/3939 →

Countries where authors are citing Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Qualitative Analysis of Insect Outbreak Systems: The Spruce Budworm and Forest.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3939.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026