"From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding
- Authors
- Clifford Geertz
- Journal
- Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/3822971 →Countries where authors are citing "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding
This map shows the geographic impact of "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding
This network shows the impact of "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding.
About "From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding
This paper, published in 1974, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Clifford Geertz covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (572 citations), Social Psychology (308 citations) and Education (181 citations). Published in Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3822971.