Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement

902 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1989, received 902 indexed citations. Written by Roger J. Cloutier covering the research area of Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (587 citations), Radiation (570 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (420 citations). Published in Radiation Research.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/3577533 →

Countries where authors are citing Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3577533.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026