Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility

1.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by Jonathan M. Levine and Carla M. D’Antonio covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (651 citations), Ecology (463 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (427 citations). Published in Oikos.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/3546992 →

Countries where authors are citing Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Elton Revisited: A Review of Evidence Linking Diversity and Invasibility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3546992.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026