In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins
- Journal
- Journal of Biblical Literature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/3260702 →Countries where authors are citing In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins
This map shows the geographic impact of In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins
This network shows the impact of In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins.
About In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins
This paper, published in 1985, received 325 indexed citations . Written by Ross Shepard Kraemer and Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza covering the research area of Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Religious studies (200 citations), Sociology and Political Science (182 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (50 citations). Published in Journal of Biblical Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3260702.