The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography

4.4k indexed citations
published 2002
Authors
Stephen P. Hubbell
Journal
Ecology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/3071998 →

Countries where authors are citing The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography.

About The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography

This paper, published in 2002, received 4.4k indexed citations . Written by Stephen P. Hubbell covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations) and Ecology (1.8k citations). Published in Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3071998.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I - The analysis of case-control studies.Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and DiseaseBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancerBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Separate visual pathways for perception and actionBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survivalBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Solving Least Squares ProblemsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing frameworkBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper CPConservation in the Presence of PseudoparticlesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper The quality of care. How can it be assessed?Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
Rankless by CCL
2026