Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint

358 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1974, received 358 indexed citations. Written by John Hagan covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (311 citations), Clinical Psychology (100 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (77 citations). Published in Law & Society Review.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/3053080 →

Countries where authors are citing Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/3053080.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026