An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data
- Authors
- Gordon V. Kass
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2986296 →Countries where authors are citing An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data
This map shows the geographic impact of An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data
This network shows the impact of An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data.
About An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data
This paper, published in 1980, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Gordon V. Kass covering the research area of Signal Processing, Statistics and Probability and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (380 citations), Information Systems (293 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (190 citations). Published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2986296.