Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams

603 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1995, received 603 indexed citations. Written by Marjorie Senechal, Atsuyuki Okabe, Barry Boots and Kōkichi Sugihara covering the research area of Building and Construction and Management Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (98 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (98 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (84 citations). Published in College Mathematics Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2687299 →

Countries where authors are citing Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2687299.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026