Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences

345 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1998, received 345 indexed citations. Written by SW, Jürgen Rost and Rolf Langeheine covering the research area of General Social Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (114 citations), Statistics and Probability (87 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (60 citations). Published in Journal of the American Statistical Association.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2669665 →

Countries where authors are citing Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2669665.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026