The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States
- Authors
- Chauncy D. Harris
- Journal
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2561395 →Countries where authors are citing The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States
This map shows the geographic impact of The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States
This network shows the impact of The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States.
About The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States
This paper, published in 1954, received 372 indexed citations . Written by Chauncy D. Harris. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (279 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (124 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (55 citations). Published in Annals of the Association of American Geographers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2561395.