Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background

561 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1972, received 561 indexed citations. Written by T. R. Dell and Jerome L. Clutter covering the research area of Statistics and Probability and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (534 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (324 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (46 citations). Published in Biometrics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2556166 →

Countries where authors are citing Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2556166.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026