The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation
- Journal
- Biometrics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2528131 →Countries where authors are citing The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation
This map shows the geographic impact of The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation
This network shows the impact of The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation.
About The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One Observation
This paper, published in 1964, received 285 indexed citations . Written by L. A. Swiger, W. R. Harvey and Kate Gregory covering the research area of Plant Science and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (184 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (144 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (86 citations). Published in Biometrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2528131.