Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 675 indexed citations. Written by Tridas Mukhopadhyay, Sunder Kekre and Suresh Kalathur covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Finance and Management of Technology and Innovation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (382 citations), Strategy and Management (352 citations) and Information Systems and Management (181 citations). Published in MIS Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/249685 →

Countries where authors are citing Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/249685.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026