GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Authors
- Geoff WalshamSundeep Sahay
- Journal
- MIS Quarterly
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/249409 →Countries where authors are citing GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1
This map shows the geographic impact of GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1
This network shows the impact of GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1.
About GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities1
This paper, published in 1999, received 421 indexed citations . Written by Geoff Walsham and Sundeep Sahay covering the research area of Geography, Planning and Development, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (234 citations), Management Information Systems (107 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (106 citations). Published in MIS Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/249409.