Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work
- Authors
- Eugene F. Fama
- Journal
- The Journal of Finance
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2325486 →Countries where authors are citing Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work
This map shows the geographic impact of Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work
This network shows the impact of Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.
About Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work
This paper, published in 1970, received 8.5k indexed citations . Written by Eugene F. Fama. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (5.2k citations), Finance (5.2k citations) and Accounting (2.4k citations). Published in The Journal of Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2325486.