Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference
- Authors
- Philip L. WagnerFredrik Barth
- Journal
- Geographical Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/214066 →Countries where authors are citing Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference
This map shows the geographic impact of Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference
This network shows the impact of Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference.
About Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference
This paper, published in 1972, received 937 indexed citations . Written by Philip L. Wagner and Fredrik Barth. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (557 citations), Political Science and International Relations (219 citations) and Anthropology (142 citations). Published in Geographical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/214066.