Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1992, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Steven J. Davis and John Haltiwanger covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (918 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (394 citations) and Accounting (137 citations). Published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2118365 →

Countries where authors are citing Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gross Job Creation, Gross Job Destruction, and Employment Reallocation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2118365.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026