Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2076166 →Countries where authors are citing Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.
This map shows the geographic impact of Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.
This network shows the impact of Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations..
About Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.
This paper, published in 1991, received 634 indexed citations . Written by Judith Lorber, Barbara F. Reskin and Patricia A. Roos. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Gender Studies (384 citations), Sociology and Political Science (337 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (194 citations). Published in Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2076166.