Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality.

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 783 indexed citations. Written by Lily M. Hoffman, Michèle Lamont and Marcel Fournier covering the research area of Urban Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (643 citations), Urban Studies (212 citations) and Music (136 citations). Published in Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2076007 →

Countries where authors are citing Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2076007.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026