Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 362 indexed citations. Written by Scott W. Palmer and Francine Hirsch covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (252 citations), Sociology and Political Science (229 citations) and Anthropology (39 citations). Published in The Slavic and East European Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/20459557 →

Countries where authors are citing Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/20459557.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026