Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition
- Authors
- William B. QuandtYael Zerubavel
- Journal
- Foreign Affairs
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/20047544 →Countries where authors are citing Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition
This map shows the geographic impact of Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition
This network shows the impact of Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition.
About Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition
This paper, published in 1996, received 636 indexed citations . Written by William B. Quandt and Yael Zerubavel covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (496 citations), Social Psychology (200 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (107 citations). Published in Foreign Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/20047544.