The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho
- Authors
- Gail M. GerhartJames Ferguson
- Journal
- Foreign Affairs
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/20045099 →Countries where authors are citing The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho
This map shows the geographic impact of The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho
This network shows the impact of The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho.
About The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho
This paper, published in 1991, received 397 indexed citations . Written by Gail M. Gerhart and James Ferguson covering the research area of Anthropology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (205 citations), Political Science and International Relations (130 citations) and Development (75 citations). Published in Foreign Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/20045099.