Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History
- Authors
- William DieboldRobert W. Cox
- Journal
- Foreign Affairs
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/20043395 →Countries where authors are citing Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History
This map shows the geographic impact of Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History
This network shows the impact of Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History.
About Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History
This paper, published in 1987, received 554 indexed citations . Written by William Diebold and Robert W. Cox. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (293 citations), Sociology and Political Science (285 citations) and Development (114 citations). Published in Foreign Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/20043395.