Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm
- Authors
- Geraldine PrattEnzo Mingione
- Journal
- Economic Geography
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/144205 →Countries where authors are citing Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm
This map shows the geographic impact of Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm
This network shows the impact of Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm.
About Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Economic Life beyond the Market Paradigm
This paper, published in 1992, received 199 indexed citations . Written by Geraldine Pratt and Enzo Mingione covering the research area of Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (99 citations), Economics and Econometrics (72 citations) and General Health Professions (65 citations). Published in Economic Geography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/144205.