Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks
- Journal
- Economic Policy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/1344591 →Countries where authors are citing Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks
This map shows the geographic impact of Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks
This network shows the impact of Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks.
About Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and Aftermath of Speculative Attacks
This paper, published in 1995, received 744 indexed citations . Written by Barry Eichengreen, Andrew K. Rose, Charles Wyplosz, Bernard Dumas and Axel A. Weber covering the research area of Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Finance (678 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (518 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (365 citations). Published in Economic Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1344591.