The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach

536 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1995, received 536 indexed citations. Written by Michael Cook covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (463 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (191 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (115 citations). Published in American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/1243338 →

Countries where authors are citing The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo‐Institutional Approach.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1243338.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026