Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366 →Countries where authors are citing Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
This network shows the impact of Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review.
About Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
This paper, published in 2018, received 219 indexed citations . Written by Amaryllis Mavragani, Gabriela Ochoa and Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis covering the research area of Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (150 citations), Sociology and Political Science (55 citations) and Health (33 citations). Published in Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366.