Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care

302 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2023, received 302 indexed citations. Written by Changyu Wang, Siru Liu, Hao Yang, Guo Jiu-lin, Yuxuan Wu and Jialin Liu covering the research area of Health Informatics, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health Informatics (212 citations), Artificial Intelligence (107 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (94 citations). Published in Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2196/48009 →

Countries where authors are citing Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/48009.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026