Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers
- Authors
- Deema Farsi
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2196/23205 →Countries where authors are citing Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers
This map shows the geographic impact of Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers
This network shows the impact of Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers.
About Social Media and Health Care, Part I: Literature Review of Social Media Use by Health Care Providers
This paper, published in 2021, received 133 indexed citations . Written by Deema Farsi covering the research area of General Health Professions, Health and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health (75 citations), General Health Professions (70 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (46 citations). Published in Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2196/23205.