Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings

362 indexed citations
published 2019
Journal
SSRN Electronic Journal

Countries where authors are citing Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings.

About Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings

This paper, published in 2019, received 362 indexed citations . Written by Florian Berg, Julian F Kölbel and Roberto Rigobón covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (210 citations), Finance (191 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (148 citations). Published in SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3438533.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026