Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by Hamed Taherdoost covering the research area of Strategy and Management, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (205 citations), Education (166 citations) and Strategy and Management (96 citations). Published in SSRN Electronic Journal.

Countries where authors are citing Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026