Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking

345 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1998, received 345 indexed citations. Written by Douglas W. Diamond and Raghuram G. Rajan covering the research area of Finance, Economics and Econometrics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Finance (303 citations), Economics and Econometrics (149 citations) and Accounting (149 citations). Published in SSRN Electronic Journal.

Countries where authors are citing Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.112473.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026