What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management

2.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 2.0k indexed citations. Written by Daniel Hoornweg and Perinaz Bhada‐Tata covering the research area of General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (1.2k citations), Building and Construction (412 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (375 citations). Published in World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1596/17388 →

Countries where authors are citing What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management more than expected).

Fields of papers citing What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1596/17388.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026