Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
- Authors
- Dénes SzűcsJohn P. A. Ioannidis
- Journal
- PLoS Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797 →Countries where authors are citing Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
This map shows the geographic impact of Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
This network shows the impact of Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature.
About Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
This paper, published in 2017, received 423 indexed citations . Written by Dénes Szűcs and John P. A. Ioannidis covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (106 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (97 citations). Published in PLoS Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000797.