Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 609 indexed citations. Written by András Nagy, Elen Gócza, Erik Díaz-Bautista, Valerie R. Prideaux and Janet Rossant covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (561 citations), Genetics (196 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (96 citations). Published in Development.

Countries where authors are citing Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1242/dev.110.3.815.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026