The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades
- Authors
- Sterling J. Nesbitt
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1206/352.1 →Countries where authors are citing The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades
This map shows the geographic impact of The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades
This network shows the impact of The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades.
About The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades
This paper, published in 2011, received 681 indexed citations . Written by Sterling J. Nesbitt covering the research area of Paleontology and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Paleontology (670 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (489 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (130 citations). Published in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1206/352.1.