Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited
- Authors
- Heinz Fehrenbach
- Journal
- Respiratory Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1186/rr36 →Countries where authors are citing Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited
This map shows the geographic impact of Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited
This network shows the impact of Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited.
About Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited
This paper, published in 2001, received 571 indexed citations . Written by Heinz Fehrenbach covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (344 citations), Molecular Biology (137 citations) and Surgery (98 citations). Published in Respiratory Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1186/rr36.