Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill
- Authors
- Jean‐Louis VincentRui P. Moreno
- Journal
- Critical Care
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1186/cc8204 →Countries where authors are citing Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill
This network shows the impact of Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill.
About Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill
This paper, published in 2010, received 434 indexed citations . Written by Jean‐Louis Vincent and Rui P. Moreno covering the research area of Epidemiology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (261 citations), Surgery (136 citations) and Emergency Medicine (110 citations). Published in Critical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1186/cc8204.