Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation
- Journal
- Critical Care
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1186/cc6863 →Countries where authors are citing Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation
This map shows the geographic impact of Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation
This network shows the impact of Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation.
About Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a multicentre evaluation
This paper, published in 2008, received 495 indexed citations . Written by Sean M. Bagshaw, Carol George and Rinaldo Bellomo covering the research area of Epidemiology, Nephrology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nephrology (400 citations), Epidemiology (249 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (139 citations). Published in Critical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1186/cc6863.