The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model
- Authors
- Andreas StahlKip M. ConnorPrzemysław SapiehaJing ChenRoberta J. Dennison
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5176 →Countries where authors are citing The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model
This map shows the geographic impact of The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model
This network shows the impact of The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model.
About The Mouse Retina as an Angiogenesis Model
This paper, published in 2010, received 505 indexed citations . Written by Andreas Stahl, Kip M. Connor, Przemysław Sapieha, Jing Chen, Roberta J. Dennison, Nathan M. Krah, Molly R. Seaward, Keirnan Willett, Christopher M. Aderman and Karen I. Guerin covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (298 citations), Ophthalmology (230 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (169 citations). Published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5176.