Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4383 →Countries where authors are citing Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects
This map shows the geographic impact of Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects
This network shows the impact of Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects.
About Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Japanese Subjects
This paper, published in 2010, received 531 indexed citations . Written by Yasushi Ikuno, T. Nouchi and Yoshiaki Yasuno covering the research area of Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ophthalmology (509 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (401 citations) and Epidemiology (53 citations). Published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4383.