Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Journal
- Biochemia Medica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031 →Countries where authors are citing Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
This map shows the geographic impact of Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
This network shows the impact of Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.
About Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
This paper, published in 2012, received 12.5k indexed citations . covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (1.2k citations) and Surgery (1.2k citations). Published in Biochemia Medica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031.