Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1149/1.2201987 →Countries where authors are citing Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders
This map shows the geographic impact of Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders
This network shows the impact of Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders.
About Size Effects on Carbon-Free LiFePO[sub 4] Powders
This paper, published in 2006, received 566 indexed citations . Written by Charles Delacourt, Philippe Poizot, Stéphane Levasseur and Christian Masquelier covering the research area of Automotive Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (553 citations), Automotive Engineering (265 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (151 citations). Published in Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1149/1.2201987.