A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration

937 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1986, received 937 indexed citations. Written by Carlo Batini, Maurizio Lenzerini and Shamkant B. Navathe covering the research area of Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (652 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (630 citations) and Information Systems (414 citations). Published in ACM Computing Surveys.

Countries where authors are citing A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1145/27633.27634.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026