Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Authors
- N. R. MorgensternD. M. Crudën
- Journal
- Canadian Geotechnical Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1139/t02-034 →Countries where authors are citing Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice
This network shows the impact of Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice.
About Probabilistic slope stability analysis for practice
This paper, published in 2002, received 438 indexed citations . Written by N. R. Morgenstern and D. M. Crudën covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (403 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (395 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (215 citations). Published in Canadian Geotechnical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1139/t02-034.